data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a7c6/4a7c6ab201a5a2697f32d585e8c15281eb4a1349" alt=""
After completing my last iteration, I really don't feel the need to experiment with different speakers / OB topology. Any improvements I thought, would come from the drivers themselves which unfortunately is about $$$, not engineering. I should also start to make a PCB and perhaps paint the speakers or something like that :)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81505/81505e65ba51d321f00ba09041a3079d251b46f8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6885/e6885787bbc44182d233654eae44291765572c29" alt=""
What I would like to gain from this one are:
- Ability of the midrange to cross lower than P13WH. Let's say 120Hz, presumably better integration with the woofers.
- Transparency of rigid cone drivers. Is the claims true?
- Much higher SPL level
And some drawbacks I would expect/investigate:
- The need to cross the mid to tweeter lower, possibly straining the tweeter.
- Would the increase of baffle from 19cm to 24cm affect the polar response in a really bad way?
- Metal cone resonance
Build process is discussed at diyAudio. See interesting finding here. Measurement data available and discussed here.
No comments:
Post a Comment